User:Xinyuy22/Celastrina echo/JuslynZC Peer Review

General info
Xinyuy22
 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Link to draft you're reviewing


 * User:Xinyuy22/Celastrina echo
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Celastrina echo
 * Celastrina echo

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

I believe they did a very good job with the lead as it contained very little information to begin with. Their edits mainly include taxonomic information about the species, and I think this is very good and important information to include. It is also concise and not overly detailed.

Content

The content added is indeed relevant to the topic and it is up-to-date. It does deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance

The content added is neutral and does not seem to be heavily biased towards one perspective over another. There are not really viewpoints that I felt were overrepresented or underrepresented.

Sources and References

The sources that they included are reliable sources of information and come from peer-reviewed resources.

Organization

The content added is very well-organized and is broken down into sections which concisely tell the reader what the major points are.

Overall Impression

My overall impression is that their edits are very informative and add good information on the topic. There is little that is known of the Celastrina echo butterfly, and I feel that the information they add is helpful for readers wanting to learn more about this butterfly. The article might be improved by adding more information about the general distribution of the species as well as its hostplants.