User:Xtiantaylor/Real estate/Shatche1 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? User:Xtiantaylor
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Real estate

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No, there was no content added to update the lead.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes, the article clearly describes the article.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, the article include a major section of brief description of the topic.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, the lead does not include information that is present in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is very brief.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? There was no content added to the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? There was no content added up-to-date but, the article was last edited Oct.9,2020.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No content was missing or content that does not belong.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? No content was added but, the article is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, there are no claims the article is biased.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, there are no viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, content was added to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No, content was added to backed up by a reliable secondary source of information.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No sources were added to reflect the available literature on the topic.
 * Are the sources current? No content was added to make the sources current.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? No content was added to this article.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes, links work but, there were no current information added.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The content that exist is easy to read
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? There were no additions to the article.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? There was no content added to the article.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, the article include images but there were no new images added.
 * Are images well-captioned. Yes, the images that are there are captioned but, there no recent images added by user.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No new images were added to adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No new images were laid out in a visually appealing way.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? No new information was added to the article
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? No new information was added to the article
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary info boxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? No new information was added to the article.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? No new information was added to the article

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? There was no content added to improve the article by the user.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? There was no strengths added by the user.
 * How can the content added be improved? There were no content added to improve the article.