User:Xujial202/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, this article content is relevant to the topic. This article introduced categories such as history, structure, and services about Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes this article is mainly neutral. The article focuses on the CBC from a neutral perspective, but missing some point of view from foreign media and other media in Canada. It is acceptable the content is neutral.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes, each claim have a specific citation, but some citation link is no longer avaliable.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes, citations are reliable. Most resources are come from Canadian local media, such as Ottawa Citizen. Majority citation is come from CBC official website.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Yes, the article solved these issues. Article. The article is from a relatively fair perspective, analyzed both positive and negative aspect.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Sources
 * Why advertising on CBC/Radio-Canada is good public policy. (2011). Nordicity Group Ltd.
 * Canadian Broadcasting Corporation : summary of the corporate plan for the period 1998/1999 to 2002/2003. (1998). Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
 * Sources
 * Why advertising on CBC/Radio-Canada is good public policy. (2011). Nordicity Group Ltd.
 * Canadian Broadcasting Corporation : summary of the corporate plan for the period 1998/1999 to 2002/2003. (1998). Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Analysis
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes article's content is relevant to the topic. Article mainly introduced history of analysis, such as the person who proposed term "analysis", and relevant analysis method. Article also contained analysis technique in differenet field.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Article is neutral. This article is mainly written for academic purpose, the content covered in this article is about introducing what is analysis.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes each claim have a citation.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Most citations are from peer-reviewed journal or books, citations are reliable.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Yes, the article solved one of wikipedia's equity gaps. Article covered aspect from differernt academic research field, and introduced historical problem about analysis.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.


 * Sources
 * Analysis (Wiesbaden, Germany). (1981). Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
 * Amann, H., & Escher, J. (2005). Analysis. Birkhäuser.

Option 3

 * Article title
 * History of Asia


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, the ariticle's content is relevant to the topic. the topic is mainly introducing history of Asis from different aspect, such as history, culture, sciences, and region.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes, the majority of this article is neutral, since this article is mainly introducing history of the Asia. So there is less possibility to have such controversial content included in this Article.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes each claim have a citation.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Most of citation are reliable, some citation links are no longer avaliable.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * This article, however, did not cover historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects. Therefore, the tone of this article can imporve this at further editing.


 * Sources
 * The Qing Dynasty . (2015). Video Education Australasia,.
 * Amino, Y., Christy, A., Tonomura, H., & Amino, Y. (2012). Rethinking Japanese history . Center for Japanese Studies, the University of Michigan.

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Confucianism
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, article's content is relevant to the topic. Content mainly introduced how Confucianism developing in East Asia (especially in China), and how Confucianism affect people's thinking and society formation in Esat Asia.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Majority content is neutral in this Article. However, some content such as "Catholic controversy over Chinese rites" included some kind of personal thought.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes each claim have a citation.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Most of citation are reliable, some citation links are no longer avaliable.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Yes, this article tackled one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. Section “Late modern” covered historically underrepresented content.
 * Yes, this article tackled one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. Section “Late modern” covered historically underrepresented content.


 * Sources
 * Zhai, C., & Chai, W. (1973). Confucianism . Barron’s Educational Series.
 * Sung, S., & Pascall, G. (2014). Gender and welfare states in East Asia : Confucianism or gender equality? . Palgrave Macmillan.

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Multimedia


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, article's content is relevant to the topic. This article mainly discussed general information about multimedia, and the applicaiton of multimedia.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Article is neutral. This article is mainly written for academic purpose, the content covered in this article is about introducing what is Multimedia.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes each claim have a citation.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Most of citation are reliable, some citation links are no longer avaliable.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Unfortunately, this article did not tackle Wikipedia's equity gaps. Since this article's principle is about application of Multimedia and general information, so this content did not mention any historical issue.


 * Sources
 * Roca, V., & Rousseau, F. (2005). Interactive multimedia and next generation networks : second international workshop on Multimedia Interactive Protocols and Systems, MIPS 2004, Grenoble, France, November 16-19, 2004 : proceedings  (1st ed. 2004.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/b103343
 * Tsihrintzis, G., Damiani, E., & Virvou, M. (2010). Intelligent Interactive Multimedia Systems and Services (1st ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14619-0