User:Xuming Li/Stuart Hall School/Xinya Gong Peer Review

General info
Xuming Li
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Xuming%20Li/Stuart_Hall_School?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_Hall_School

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hi Xuming, here is my peer review for your article.

Lead

 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

There is a short lead in the new content that Xuming has been working with, but I think the lead is too short for this article about the Stuart hall school. You can add a brief introduction paragraph in the lead to briefly describe the major sections in the article, which can let the reader have a better understanding and an overview of the article.

Content

 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Is the content added up-to-date?

Xuming did a really good job of introducing the new section of the traditions in the article of the Stuart hall school. This new section of traditions is relevant to the school and added up to date. This new topic he has introduced is fully organized and contains many small sections under the tradition’s topic, which enriched the content.

Tone and Balance

 * Is the content added neutral?

The whole content is neutrally introducing the Stuart hall school’s traditions to the readers. Xuming is describing and stating the fact of the school’s tradition, which fulfills the rule of editing in the Wikipedia community.

Sources and References

 * Are the sources current? Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors?

All the sources and references that Xuming has proved are all current and accurate. However, the sources and references are from the school website so the source of information lacks diversity. The local newspaper in the area of the Stuart hall school might contain information about the school’s traditions, which is a good and reliable source of information for this article.

Organization

 * Is the content added well-written? Does the content add to have any grammatical or spelling errors? Is the content added well-organized?

The content is well organized and well written which is easy for the reader to read and includes much detailed information about the traditions of the school. Xuming has divided the information into five different small sections to talk about the topic of the school's traditions. There are some grammatical errors and spelling errors that appear in the article so I just made a minor change in the sections that Xuming has been working on.

Images and Media

 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Dumping has been added to the article, which makes it well explained the location of the Stuart hall school. He added a map of the United States with red marks pointing to the state of Virginia. This map lets the reader know the location of the school in the big picture from the United States.

Overall impressions

 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article? What are the strengths of the content added? How can the content added be improved?

Yes, the article has become more complete. The content that Xuming has added improved the overall quality of the article, which makes the article become more complete and strengthens it. In my opinion, Xuming can improve his sections by adding more different sources of information and putting on a lead section in the article.

-- Cindy gong