User:Y5tann/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
I am evaluating an article about video manipulation. Click here for link.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate because (at some point in time) everyone experiences video manipulation, and I have noticed it more and more in my daily life. My preliminary impression of this relates to well-known video platforms such as Youtube and Instagram. This topic matters because it affects society both socially and politically. Not only that but the consequences and impacts caused by video manipulation have more of an influence on the world than one might think.

Lead Section

 * There is an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article topic of video manipulation
 * Brief mentions of major sections
 * Lead does include information around educational videos (as one of the main methods of video manipulation) but was not really present in the article overall
 * The lead in full is short and concise

Content

 * The article's content is relevant to the topic (incorporating policy analysis)
 * Content is, somewhat, relatively up-to-date
 * MASK VIDEO: 9 years ago
 * POLITICAL DEEPFAKES: 4 years ago
 * There are some topics revolving around video & photo manipulation that was not mentioned in the article (ex. clickbait, Youtube thumbnails)
 * Chosen topic does indeed address underrepresented issues considering the heavy political and social ties

Tone and Balance

 * Article is written in a neutral point of view
 * Claims do not seem to be heavily biased or underrepresented
 * Some viewpoints are interpreted more deeply, but is valid in terms of comprehension and understanding
 * Overall content is direct and informative (without a specific position perspective)

Sources and References

 * Wikipedia did state that the article needs additional citations for verification. (January 2021)
 * All links and citations currently work

Organization and writing quality

 * The article is very easy to read
 * Article does seem to have very slight and small grammatical errors (commas, prepositions, spaces)
 * Well-organized in major and sub topics

Images and Media

 * No images were included in the article

Talk page discussion

 * No conversations or discussions on the talk page

Overall impression

 * Wikipedia Index
 * Status: Start-Class
 * Completeness Score: 46
 * Average views per day: 23
 * Article Strengths include very detailed and descriptive information
 * Some improvements that can be implement into the article is visual representation as well as subtopics that were not mentioned from the beginning
 * Personal completeness score: Somewhat developed