User:YH4DU/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title: Energy usage of the United State military
 * Article Evaluation: The evaluation on this article will included sections on lead, content, tone, reference, writing quality, Images and talk page discussion. Firsly, the lead does clearly describe the article’s topic and it included a brief description of the article’s major sections. Secondly, the articles content is only partially relevant to the topic. Thirdly, the article is present in a neutral tone, where it does not have any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. Fourthly, only some of the facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information and those source is not current. Fifthly, the article is well written, where it has very little grammar mistake. In addition, the images shows on the article can help me enhance the understanding of the topic. Lastly, in the discussion page the article has been rate as start class. Overall, this article is in good status, where its strength included good grammar, attractive image and detail lead section. Some of the improvement that the article should make is to find more secondary source to support its facts.
 * Sources: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301421513004576
 * Sources: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301421513004576
 * Sources: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301421513004576

Option 2

 * Article title: War in Afghanistan
 * Article Evaluation: The evaluation on this article will included sections on lead, content, tone, reference, writing quality, Images and talk page discussion. Firsly, the lead does clearly describe the article’s topic and it included a brief description of the article’s major sections. Secondly, the articles content is relevant to the topic. Thirdly, the article is present is not present in a neutral tones, where the claim that the article is making is heavily toward the United state position. Fourthly, the facts in the article is not backed up by a reliable secondary source of information and those source is are current.  Fifthly, the article is well written, where it has very little grammar mistake. In addition, the images shows on the article can help me enhance the understanding of the topic. Lastly, in the discussion page the article has been rate as C- class. Overall, this article is in good status, where its strength included good structure content, and good grammar. Some of the improvement that the article should make is they should use secondary source to support its facts. Also, the article should not overrepresented on the United State perspective.
 * Sources: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504500109470086
 * Sources: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504500109470086
 * Sources: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504500109470086

Option 3

 * Article title: Iraq War
 * Article Evaluation: Evaluation: The evaluation on this article will included sections on lead, content, tone, reference, writing quality, Images and talk page discussion. Firsly, the lead does clearly describe the article’s topic and it included a brief description of the article’s major sections. Secondly, the articles content is relevant to the topic. Thirdly, the article is present in a neutral tone, where it does not have any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. Fourthly, some of the fact in the article has been backed up by a reliable secondary source of information and those source is not current. Fifthly, the article is well written, where it has very little grammar mistake. In addition, the images shows on the article can help me enhance the understanding of the topic. Lastly, in the discussion page the article has been rate as C- class. Overall, this article is in good status, where its strength is that the article have provide really clear introduction and the viewpoints that are present in the article is not overrepresented, or underrepresented. Some of the improvement that the article should make is they should use more secondary source to support its facts.
 * Sources: https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/13838
 * Sources: https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/13838
 * Sources: https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/13838

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources