User:YaelPacheco/Istiblennius zebra/Dkim3738 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?  (YaelPacheco)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:YaelPacheco/Istiblennius zebra
 * Link to the current version of the article:
 * Istiblennius zebra
 * Istiblennius zebra

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? No information
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) Current version provides.
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? Section and sub titles need to be addded
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? Need to add sections.
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) What is given is appropriate, need to add more information.
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?Yes
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? Yes one reference.
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? Yes
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources? Qualitaty is reliable as it is from an article on biology and fishes.
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above): Needs more reference, information on the fish, and section for the species.
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? No change is need. needs to add more information
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? No, for it to be ready more information and sections need to be added.
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Sections and information
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Not in particular.