User:Yairelizvg/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Fenty Beauty
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I chose this article to evaluate because it involves two things that interest me; makeup and music. The founder of the Fenty Beauty brand is the artist Rihanna, who is one of my favorites, and the brand is about cosmetics.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * The introductory sentence tells right away what the article is about. In this case, it says that the Fenty Beauty brand was founded by Rihanna and that is a makeup brand.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * The Lead do not include a brief description of the article sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No, the information on the Lead is related to the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * I believe is concise but it could be better.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * All the information of the article is relevant and related to the topic, which is the Fenty Beauty brand.
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * The content is up to date, and the last time that the article page was edited was on September 20, 2020.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * I believe all the content is placed correctly, and that the article is not missing important information.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Yes, the tone of the article is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, there is not any claims biased towards a particular position.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No, the point of view is neutral as well.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, the article is for know about the Fenty Beauty brand.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, the article is backed up with reliable sources.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * I checked a few links and the worked pretty well.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * The article is well-writen, well-composed and is concise, clear and easy to read.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, the article is well organized. It contains 9 sections with their proper information.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * The article include a few photos that enhance the reading and understanding of it.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * The images are well-captioned, and very precise.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes, the images are laid out in a visually appealing way.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * I think that the article strengths is that is precise, has really good sources and links, and is well composed and organized.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: