User:Yamcosh/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Heneral Luna

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I had watched this movie recently, and feel like there could be a lot to say about it. It is a historical film with some fictional and some nonfictional parts about the Philippine-American War. I expected to see a lot of production and reception information in addition to casting and plot. The article was written in a neutral tone and gives a lot of information from 2015-2016. It did not give personal opinions or reviews of the movie but only cited official critics and their opinions.

Evaluate the article
The first sentence of the lead section adequately summarizes what the article is about and what the subject is. The menu in the lead section covers all the important aspects of the film. The lead section is concise and clear.

The article's content is relevant and up-to-date. There is no missing content or content that does not belong. It would be good if the article included American critic responses instead of only critical responses by Philippine news outlets.

All claims are neutral and unbiased. Any claims that may support a certain viewpoint are by critics and cited. There is no position the article tries to persuade the reader toward.

There are many sources, and information is constantly cited. Since this is a film, the most important information is contemporary to the release of the film. There is not really insightful information after 2016, so there are few sources that are less than 5 years old. There are 87 total sources that come from many different sources. The links work.

The article is well-written, well-organized, and free of grammatical errors.

There are very few images in the article, and they all depict only the most essential information to the article. Everything has a good caption, and the images are only for more notable information. They enhance understanding, follow copyright rules, and are laid out throughout the article well.

Even though the article itself is very thorough, the talk page is very short, with only a couple comments that aren't insightful. It is part of multiple WikiProjects like film and Philippines.

I think this article is very strong. It gives all the practical information that is relevant and notable. Critical information is given as well, and is not overwhelming and does not dominate the article. It is very complete, and I don't think much else can be added to improve it.