User:Yangsiruiyang/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Peer review
 * Article Evaluation:It has the introduction. The structure is clear. The lead is detailed. It's relevant to the topic. It's up to date. It's related to historical events. The tone and balence are neutral. The source is current. Fact is reliable. Better sources are available. It's easy to read. It don't have grammar mistakes and well-organized. It has a image and relevant to the topic. The article's structure is good and easy to read. The overall is good and relevant to the topic. It's rated good. It can't be improved.
 * Sources:Peer review

Option 2

 * Article title:Scholarly peer review
 * Article Evaluation:It's has a good lead. The introduction is clear. The lead is concise. The content is relevant. It's up-to-date. It address topics related to historically topics. The tone is neutral. No biased in the article. The viewpoints are clear. The source is current and clear. Fact is reliable. Better sources are available. It's well-writtend and well-organized. No imgae in the article. It's rated good. The overall status is good. The article is well-organized. It can't be improved.
 * Sources:Scholarly peer review

Option 3

 * Article title:Peer mentoring
 * Article Evaluation:It's has a good lead. The introduction is clear. The lead is concise. The content is relevant. It's up-to-date. It address topics related to historically topics. The tone is neutral. No biased in the article. The viewpoints are clear. The source is current and clear. Fact is reliable. Better sources are available. It's well-writtend and well-organized. No imgae in the article. It's rated good. The overall status is good. The article is well-organized. It can't be improved.
 * Sources
 * Sources:Peer mentoring

Option 4

 * Article title:Peer assessment
 * Article Evaluation:It's has a good lead. The introduction is clear. The lead is concise. The content is relevant. It's up-to-date. It address topics related to historically topics. The tone is neutral. No biased in the article. The viewpoints are clear. The source is current and clear. Fact is reliable. Better sources are available. It's well-writtend and well-organized. No imgae in the article. It's rated good. The overall status is good. The article is well-organized. It can't be improved.
 * Sources:Peer assessment

Option 5

 * Article title:
 * Article Evaluation:
 * Sources: