User:Yangyuzhong/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Feminist method

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article as it relates to the course. GSWS 322 deals with Feminist approaches to research. Therefore, I expect the article to help me understand how research can be conducted from a feminist perspective.

Evaluate the article
The article contains a good lead section that defines the topic (feminist method) and provides a concise overview. However, the article's credibility is questionable due to some missing citations. Edit history reveals major problems with missing citations. Nonetheless, the links to the provided references work.

Regarding organization, the article is divided into sections that enhance readability and reflect the major points of feminist methods. There are no spelling and grammatical errors, which make understanding easier. However, no images are incorporated into the article to enhance understanding.

From the talk page discussion, it is evident that the "feminist method" idea is controversial. Other editors argue that the ideology is not compatible with science. The authors raise a pseudoscientific argument, which assumes that the feminist method is based on science, thus making the article biased and lacking credibility.

Overall, the article is weak as it lacks citations and raises controversial issues that other editors disagree with. These features make the article poorly developed. Although the article is well structured, the authors should avoid raising controversial issues. They should present facts that can be verified by peer-reviewed sources rather than pseudoscientific ideas.