User:Yanyan Melhcor/Splendid partulina/Curtnyp Peer Review

General info
Yanyan Melhcor
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Yanyan Melhcor/Splendid partulina
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Splendid partulina

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family)
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate?
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved?
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience)
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom?
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources?
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article?
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?

Hi, Yanyan


 * 1) The article did well in creating different sections. I liked that the article included the origin name to the new name of the species.  Rianne - Thank you for liking it. 
 * 2) The style and language/tone of the article is appropriate. And the information that’s in the article is put in its appropriate section. The article is kept to its specific species and has other sections about it.  Rianne - Thank you, Ill keep it that way 
 * 3) Looking at the sources the author used are good and reliable sources. The author sourced most of the sentences except for the first of the sentences in the Conservative Status. The References at the bottom were also put in citation form.  Rianne - It's hard to find other sources for m species that why i kept using that reference of conservation status because it discusses most of the detail in that website. 
 * 4) A few suggestions I have is to add more details about the species in most of the sections. Be more detailed in your description section. Keep the format of the sections consistent because I noticed that the “Lead” and “Article Body” didn’t have the same format as the other sections.  Rianne - Ill make changes on my format. I will also add more detail but for the moment its difficult to find some. 
 * 5) I think the most important thing the author needs to improve on is providing more details about its species because the article doesn’t seem to have many details aside from a few sentences, but I do understand that it’s difficult to find a lot of information on species like this.  Rianne - Ill add more detail and information soon, Thank you for the comment <3 
 * 6) I could apply adding information about the status of my species into my article and also adding information about its origin name (if it was changed).  Rianne - I'm happy to hear that <3.