User:Yanyan Melhcor/Splendid partulina/Naksue Peer Review

General info
@Yanyan Melhcor
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Yanyan Melhcor/Splendid partulina
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Splendid partulina

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? The article effectively arranged the information in the appropriate section.  Rianne - Thank you, I'll try to add more information in each section. 
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) Yes, the article only discussed its designated species, this includes its Origin, Habitat, Description, and Conservation Status.  Rianne - Thank you for the feed back I'll maintain to only discuss my species. 
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? Yes, subtitles for the different sections are appropriate.  Rianne - Thank you, I'll update them more soon. 
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? The information under each section is appropriate. However, the author should include more description in each section.  Rianne- I will try to add more, but due to the rarity of my species its difficult. 
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) The writing style of the article is appropriate.  Rianne - Ill maintain the appropriateness. 
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? Yes, each sentence is linked to a source in the reference list except for the first sentence in the Conservation Status.  Rianne - Thank you, Ill add more soon. 
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? There is a list of references at the bottom, but there are only four. I propose adding an additional one. Well done, though, on finding such reliable sources.  Rianne - Im still trying to search more info, Ill add more soon 
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? Yes, each sources is linked with a little number.  Rianne- I make sure to do that every sentence, thank you for the comment. 
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources? Every source is reliable and includes a substantial amount of information that is essential to the article's overall success.  Rianne- Thank you so much <3 
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? I don't suggest any changes but this article could be improved by adding more information in each section.  Rianne- Ill try to add more, just need more research. 
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? Not quite ready; the author should add more comprehensive and well-constructed sentences rather than just one in each section.  Rianne - I'll make sure to do that, thank you <3 
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? If there are any, please add more sentences and details. I know it can be challenging to locate additional information about endangered species. So try your best!  Rianne - THANK YOU<3, I WILL ! 
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? The author mentioned the species' origin, so if there are any, I might think about including that.  Rianne - I'm Happy to hear that <3