User:Yaritzalopez/Immigration to Costa Rica/Abcquantumle Peer Review

General info
Yaritza Lopez
 * Whose work are you reviewing:
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Immigration to Costa Rica
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Nicaraguans

Evaluate the drafted changes
=== Lead: The edited article's leads are solid, and its contents reflect a thoughtful, concise, and precise description of the significant section. It includes and presents vital information for the updated, more detailed version. === Content: Yes, the content is relevant to the topic and up to date; it is not missing or leaving any gaps, and it addresses the historical topic well.

Tone and Balance: the content is neutral and balanced. It appears historically correct and is a guiding post for all Wikipedia readers.

Sources and References:  The author has a good amount of sources to back up here edits information. However, “Group Programs - was inaccessible,

Carrie McCracken was also inaccessible and I do not think these are reliable sources even though the edits were great. Also, the 3rd source was good because it did match your PE who is working in the field but the last source I would not rely on because it is not a peer reviewed or journal article deemed unreliable.

Organization: The article is well organized and written, concise, and easy to read. The added content is also clear, very detailed, and free of errors.

Images and Media: No new images or media were added.

For a new article: This is not a new article.

Overall impressions: The author has improved the quality of the article by layering more concise details relating to the article and her PE. I am very impressed with this edited article as it gives its strengths and it is more complete.