User:Yaskam23/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Dieting

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The Wikipedia page on Dieting offers several examples of credible material and unbiased tones, indicating that the author does not share unjust statements about the subject, but it also has a slightly ambiguous structure and a few corrections and revisions that scholars should be aware of.

Evaluate the article
The tone of the Wikipedia article "Dieting" is generally neutral and nonpartisan. Many times, on the page, the editor uses factual material as well as formal and objective tones to convey an unbiased perspective, or rather, no opinion at all. When the editor presents an example in the History section of the article about author William Banting, a man who promoted and designed one of the first popular weight loss regimens in the nineteenth century, factual material is provided. There was no mention of partiality when it came to Banting Only data assessing his procedures and a book created to describe his dieting approach are available. Factual information provided in a neutral tone is also included in the part defining low-fat, low-carb, low-calorie, very low-calorie, detox, and religious diets. Only a brief summary of what each of the diets listed entails, as well as the names of a few prominent diets connected with each strategy, are included in this portion of the Wikipedia page. To make the section less biased, the editor may include a relatively comprehensive list of each diet connected with each technique rather than emphasizing on the few prominent diets linked with each methodology.

The Wikipedia article "Dieting" appeared to have a straightforward structure. The information was laid out in a way that was not overly complicated and easy to follow. It aided in the communication of a logical flow of information. The editor began with a lead section that provided a quick outline of the issue under discussion. The editor then decided to break the essay into sections, beginning with a five-paragraph history lesson on the popularization of diets over the twentieth century. The editor continued, maintaining a pretty neutral tone, to enumerate the various sorts of diets that may be found Low-fat, low-carb, low-calorie, very low-calorie, detox, and religious diets are among the most popular. The sections on nutrition and how the body sheds fat follow the brief overview of the various types of diets. Following that is a haphazard collection of further material that could be better arranged but does not cause too much confusion in its current state. Overall, the Wikipedia page has a good structure. It could use a little more organization to assist portray a stronger sense of rationality, but there are no major issues.

The attribute of being compelling or believable is defined as credibility. When defining dieting, the Wiki page "Dieting" incorporates a lot of solid, factual information. The editor drew on a statement from the American Physiological Society to describe how the body uses glycogen when it expends more energy than it consumes, or, to put it another way, when it exercises. Another trustworthy source where a researcher could explore for additional in-depth information concerning the issue of dieting is William Banting's book, which was referenced in the article. The eating plan he devised and followed to perfection is contained in William Banting's book "Letter on Corpulence." A quotation from the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, which states, "additional studies have indicated that the average individual maintains some weight loss following dieting," is a third example of a reliable source utilized in presenting the information on the Wikipedia article. The fourth is a research titled "Medicare's hunt for effective obesity treatments: diets are not the answer" that was published in The American Psychologist. The editor makes use of this material by presenting the study findings that show that short-term dieting with significant caloric restriction does not result in weight loss. Despite the fact that the page featured information from very reliable sources, there were numerous corrections that might be made to increase the Wikipedia article's quality.

However, while reading the article, I discovered certain errors that could be corrected. One item I would change is the source of information concerning a woman who died as a result of a so-called "water diet." This source, infoniac.com, appears to be a shady website. The website appears untrustworthy not only because of the domain name ".com," but also because of the numerous advertisements shown and the website's poor appearance. I would also remove a broken link from www.al-mawrid.com, which used to provide information on various religious diets that involve fasting. I would look for a new site that both provides the same information regarding fasting in other religions and is trustworthy. Finally, I would correct the information taken from jupiterscientific.org. It appears to be trustworthy because it has the domain name ".org," but when I clicked on the link, I discovered that the website was outdated. Because of the time it was written, the information could be totally valid but possibly incorrect. I'd merely go for a more recent source to get the information from.