User:Yasminemahm./Newcomer education/Nicole Lizbeth Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jennanand


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jennanand/New sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Newcomer education

Evaluate the drafted changes
Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article?

The content adds more depth and examples to the overall article. The text is well articulated and clearly states what Germany is doing with its education programs and hones in on the issue. I enjoyed the specific examples because they put everything into context. The citations added also are relevant to the topic and support the information added.

'''What are the strengths of the added content? How can it be improved?'''

As I mentioned above, there is an excellent use of examples within the text, and it adds to the article. The only area of improvement would be on the lookout for some of the wording in order to make it easier to read and for it to make an impact.

Is the content well organized?

The content is well organized and flows nicely throughout the article. In addition, there is a good use of citations throughout the text.

Are there any claims that appear as bias?

The added text does an excellent job at remaining neutral and simply presenting information on newcomer education in Germany and programs in the US.