User:Yasminemahm./Refugee children/Nicole Lizbeth Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jennanand


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jennanand/New sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Refugee children

Evaluate the drafted changes
Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article?

Again, the content added to the article provides excellent examples and explanations for the importance of framing education in a way that caters to the needs of refugee children. The examples given are robust and supported by articles relevant to the text. In addition, the sentences are short and straight to the point making the article easy to read.

'''What are the strengths of the added content? How can it be improved?'''

As mentioned above, the concise nature of the text makes for an easy read. Again, there is not much to be improved, but I think the wording can be revised. You have some fantastic contributions, but I think it will benefit from connecting some of the first couple sentences to flow more smoothly and just using language that will make an impact to mimic the existing article for cohesion.

Is the content well organized?

The content is organized and is placed appropriately throughout the existing article.

Are there any claims that appear as bias?

There are no claims that appear as bias. It is neutral and factual.