User:Yautja199/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Achilles

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I am familiar with the subject and enjoy it.

Lead Section

 * The first sentence clearly describes the topic
 * The lead lacks summarizing the entire article's main points, it rather goes into his death and why he died.
 * No information present in the lead that isn't in the article.
 * It is over detailed on his death, this could be discussed elsewhere.

Content

 * All content in the article is relevant to Achilles, both in mythology and modern culture
 * It looks to be up to date as of 2018 regarding information, but has been recently edited.
 * No missing or unwelcome content.
 * It does not deal with an equity gap.

Tone and Balance

 * Article is written neutrally.
 * No biases present.
 * No under/overrepresented viewpoints.
 * Article does not attempt to persuade any viewpoints.

Sources and References

 * Points are backed up with reliable sources.
 * Sources range from various dates, from original primary sources to recent articles.
 * Links work.

Organization and Writing Quality

 * Article is easy to read and clear.
 * No grammatical errors.
 * Well organized.

Images and Media

 * Article contains artwork of subject relevant to topics.
 * Images are well captioned.
 * Images are placed well.
 * Follow copyright rules.

Talk Page Discussion

 * Some comments concerning grammar, minor mistakes in mythology, and suggestions on things to add to the page.
 * It is part of many WikiProjects and is rated well.
 * It is discussed fairly similar, just goes into more depth.

Overall Impressions

 * It is considered a vital article
 * The article gives a good and brief explanation of the subject and relevant history and subjects.
 * Article could provide photos of modern depictions of Achilles, as they are discussed.
 * The article is well developed and practically complete.