User:Yazzymine688/Michael (poem)/Foucauldienspirit Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Yazzymine688


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Yazzymine688/Michael (poem)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Michael (poem)
 * Michael (poem)

Evaluate the drafted changes
There is no added Lead, however the current Lead for the article is very robust, so I'm not sure if there's a need to add to it.

Good job in adding a Background. The background starts by a statement of the writer's intent, then goes into a scholarly statement. The last sentence could be construed as a subjective statement, as it is not cited, however, it seems that it is a paraphrase and could be cited with revision.

The added content uses proper sourcing, as they are secondary sources found on JSTOR.

Overall, the added content is relevant and well sourced. In the sandbox, there are no citations (outside the references 'divet') however in the article published, there is a citation. I'm not sure if that's simply the way Wikipedia sandboxes, function, but it was initially confusing. Additionally, any paraphrased content should be cited.