User:Yc19990311/Hu Shih/Min-Fan1 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Yc19990311
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Yc19990311/Hu Shih

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? YES
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? NO
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? NO
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?YES
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? concise

Lead evaluation
"Hu Shih is considered as one of the key leader of Chinese language reform the vernacular style of writing article. And also the 1911 Revolution and the movement of the modern culture in China early years." There's a bit of a problem with the articulation of these two sentences, and there seems to be a problem with the grammar of the second sentence

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? YES
 * Is the content added up-to-date? YES
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? NO
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? NO

Content evaluation
Your structure is detailed, so the reader knows at a glance what you will be presenting.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? YES
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? NO
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? NO
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? NO

Tone and balance evaluation
Your article seems very objective and neutral.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? YES
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? YES
 * Are the sources current? YES
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? YES
 * Check a few links. Do they work? YES

Sources and references evaluation
All of your sources fits the topic of your article.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? YES
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? NO
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? YES

Organization evaluation
The structure of your article is clear and detailed, so that the reader can clearly know what your article is going to introduce. However, I would suggest that you could add some more contents to the story of Hu Shih's life, as the existing content is all about HuShih's connections to other people and things, and perhaps you could spend a little more content on Hu Shih himself.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? YES
 * Are images well-captioned? YES
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? YES
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? YES

Images and media evaluation
The picture you show is very good, and below the picture also explains the basic information about Hu Shih.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? YES
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? YES
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? YES
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? NO

New Article Evaluation
The article is structured in detail and contains some things that are not in the existing articles.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? YES
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Good
 * How can the content added be improved? Perhaps some more general headings could be added, like HuShih 's early life, his education.

Overall evaluation
All in all, well done! Your content is very detailed and the introductory section gives the reader a general idea of what you are going to write about in this article, and the images are added properly. But I'm not sure if the images you've added will fit the requirements. Because it already has the same image from the exsting article