User:Yellowsun01/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Means of communication - Wikipedia)

Why have you chosen this article to evaluate?
The way in which communication is exchanged has continued to change. This is why I have chosen to evaluate this article. Things are always changing, and new ideas are continuing to be developed. I think it's important to have an understanding how this process of communication has developed, which this article seems to discuss.

Evaluate the article!
The definition of "Means of Communcation", is clearly defined. Examples of such are used to help describe and build a stronger definition. What isn't included are the "main topics" that are going to be further discussed in the article. While it does flow into the history of the term.

I do think that the information that is shared in this article is important to the topic, but there could be more information that is up to date. The article is set up in a definition basis with bullet points that clearly define that particular idea.

With this article I think it follows these guidelines and doesn't steer one way or another. It is super informational and getting definitions along with examples across the board.

A few of the links that I clicked on did work. However, I mentioned previously that I do think there could be updated sources that could be used in this article. A wide range of authors are used. Overall, I feel that with a few new sources it could help the entirety of the article.

For the most part this article is fairly easy to follow along and read through. New vocab words that are used are clearly defined in a manner that one can easily understand. Each section that is shared has its own title.

There is only one image that is used in this article. Based on this topic, I feel that if no more, but a better image could be used to help really draw readers in.

As far as the talk page goes for this discussion, I didn't locate any "conversations" taking place here.

Overall, I think this article has good information that it is trying to share. With some updated articles and a few changes, I think that this article could be made stronger. The overall flow of the article is easy to follow along, but a few more details could be added just to make each point stand out that much more.