User:Yesseniaml/Aquatic biodiversity research/CONeal19 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * User:Yesseniaml
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Yesseniaml/Aquatic biodiversity research
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Aquatic biodiversity research

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead of the article is short, but I think it is a fine definition of the subject. The current article needs a lot of sources cited and a reference list added instead of just have textual in-line sources. The current draft has good examples of specific anthropogenic influences, but could use more generalized information and sources alongside the examples. A bit of editing for grammar and wording could help, for example making sure that all words in a sentence are using past or present tense instead of mixing of both. Overall, I think that the information is good and covers the topic in an informative and neutral way. Some more sources and a bit of editing will make this a great article.