User:Yesseniaml/Aquatic biodiversity research/Foresttoprairiekaren Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Yesseniaml


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Yesseniaml/Aquatic biodiversity research


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Aquatic biodiversity research

Evaluate the drafted changes
'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?'''


 * Everything seems relevant. My only suggestion would be to search through abstracts and introductions of some more articles to find more basic/generic information to add OR to just have some more citations to back up the information you already have.

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?'''


 * The article is neutral, or as neutral as you can be when discussing how humans impact the environment.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?


 * I think it would be helpful to link to other Wiki articles that go into detail about the physical, chemical, and biological conditions of a stream so readers understand what is physically impacting the decrease in biodiversity.

'''Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''


 * The title link (bolded) for this citation does not seem to be working, but the doi link is working: Hanford, Jayne K.; Webb, Cameron E.; Hochuli, Dieter F. (2020). "Management of urban wetlands for conservation can reduce aquatic biodiversity and increase mosquito risk". Journal of Applied Ecology. 57 (4): 794–805. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13576. ISSN 0021-8901.
 * All the other links are working.
 * My main concern is that you only have five references. I remember Dr. Chraibi saying something about 12 articles, so you may just want to confirm with her if there is a strict requirement.

'''Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''


 * Even if the information for a group of maybe three sentences all came from the same article, I think it would be good to use a citation after each sentence. That makes is super clear where you got that information from.

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?'''


 * None that I can tell.

One more suggestion:


 * There are some sentences that need some sentence structure and tense edits. Read it out loud to help you find those. (I literally write letters for a job and read all of mine out loud to catch things. I ALWAYS find something!)