User:Yfz5256/Xiaomi/Ojg5046 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username): User:Yfz5256
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Xiaomi

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
It does not seem that Yfz5256 has made any contributions to the page. I am turning this review in as of 10:21pm on October 18th and am assuming that no changes will be added before midnight when this assignment is due

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes it is all directly related
 * Is the content added up-to-date? The last edit was made within the last week, and the majority of the citations are from the last 5 years so the content is very recent
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? All of the content is related to the topic and seems to be organized based on news of the topic
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No, the topic is an electronics company hat primarily deals with smartphones and appliances so it does not address any kind of equitable subject as of now.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? The content is primarily neutral and focuses on the history of the company
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? A majority of the information does not seem to be biased, since the content is mostly sales figures and news of company upgrades.
 * Are there viewpoints that are over-represented, or underrepresented? the content is mostly sales figures and news of company upgrades from a researcher's point of view
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No it is purely informational

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes there are over 150 sources (159 as of now) so the information is very thorough and someone looking up this topic would have many various references to comb through.
 * Are the sources current? the majority of the citations are from the last 5 years so the content is very current
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? It appears that most of the sources are from news sites from around the world. This is a diverse spectrum of authors but not necessarily inclusive of voices from marginalized groups
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes the links appear to be working

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes most of the content is very detailed, well written, and informational when needed.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? None to be found
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, the overall content is organized by history of the company so the topics are by year. This makes it very easy to find the information you may want on the company if you know the basic time-frame of what you are looking for.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
It does not seem that Yfz5256 has made any contributions to the page. I am turning this review in as of 10:21pm on October 18th and am assuming that no changes will be added before midnight when this assignment is due

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
It does not seem that Yfz5256 has made any contributions to the page. I am turning this review in as of 10:21pm on October 18th and am assuming that no changes will be added before midnight when this assignment is due