User:Yiding wang/The Eight Hundred/Hannahisamyth Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * 1) The lead does not describe or give a brief introduction to tell what the article content about.
 * 2) I don't think this group understands what should Lead contains.
 * 3) This lead is more like a brief plot of the film.
 * 4) The content of the article is more like an extended discussion of the plot
 * 5) There is nothing new compared with the original Wikipedia article.
 * 6) There is no in-text citation in this article.
 * 7) The format of the references list is not correct.
 * 8) The resources links are working but not reliable.
 * 9) The headings are not in italics.

The article is not well organized, it reads like machine translated without manually correct.

There are some puzzling sentences get me confused like:

1. "The film is narrated in the sky, narrating the daily battles."

2." And this regiment was the regiment led by Xie Jinyuan, the deputy chief of the film."

The content does not improve the quality of the article.