User:Ymz5231/sandbox

I choose to evaluate the article in Women in China on Health Care. There is one thing that distracts me. In the third paragraph, it talks about the ratio of men to women in China which is not that relevant towards health care. In this paragraph, although the editor wanted to talk about nutrition, sex and women missing, it seems that it focuses more on some basic facts that is not very relevant to health care. But the first two paragraph are pretty relevant. The article is neutral. It only lists facts of women’s health care in China and do a little comparison with men in China. There is no bias. The viewpoints are all very basic, which means that there is no points that are over or under represented. The links work for each corresponding citation. And the source supports the claim in the article. I do not know whether it is appropriate. I think that the article should add something towards health insurance. Whether it changes or not, insurance is a very important part in health care. I am pretty surprised about what the Talk page shows out. It seems that this stub is really poor nearly 10 years ago. It must be changed a lot these years. The article is rated as GA--Good Article. In our class, we discuss health care in a comparative way. We discuss differences between men and women on health care. And in this article, it only lists on comparison on health care first tailor were men.

For women in China, the most likely cancer to be found is cervical cancer. The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests to use routine screening to confirm if this woman gets cervical cancer. However, information on cervical cancer screening is not quite available for women in China.