User:Youngrizz25/Bistorta amplexicaulis/Lwill17 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Youngrizz25


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Youngrizz25/Bistorta_amplexicaulis?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead section is strong and very informative. However, it contains information that should be in other sections such as taxonomy. The sections other than the lead are blank. There is only one source in the Bibliography, so additional sources are needed.