User:Your Cousin Spagooblio/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title: Antidiuretic
 * Article Evaluation
 * The content is relevant
 * It's written neutrally
 * Only two claims have citations
 * The citations appear to be from official, secondary medical sources, so they appear reliable
 * There is some mention in the talk section about confusion as to the status of certain hormones as either diuretics or antidiuretics.
 * Sources
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30784603
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26584969
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657991
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30252325
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22433947
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22433947

Option 2

 * Article title: Pulsatile secretion
 * Article Evaluation
 * Much of the content is not relevant
 * It's written neutrally.
 * Many claims do not have citations
 * Some citations appear to be primary research and out of date.
 * There is no activity in the talk section
 * Also, I suspect some plagiarism/copyright violation: it seems as though some statements are ripped from the textbook.
 * Sources
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25637831
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29463575
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29544644
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31521706
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28790978
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28790978

Option 3

 * Article title: Antidepressant
 * Article Evaluation
 * The content seems to be all relevant
 * I see no opinionated language
 * Every claim seems to have a citation
 * The sources seem to come from textbooks and peer-reviewed journals, so they seem reliable
 * There is recent activity in the talk section about clarifying information in certain sections, adding new information, and whether certain readable, but not very verifiable information should be removed.
 * Sources
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26975593
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10086478
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30138204
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27423475
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16913164
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16913164

Option 4

 * Article title: Cortisone
 * Article Evaluation
 * The information seems to all be relevant
 * It appears neutral
 * Some claims do not have citations
 * Some sources seem to be from .com websites, and do not seem very reliable
 * There is some activity in the talk section about clarifying terminology relating cortisone and cortisol, some about whether or not an article is mistaken about cortisone's structure, and some about the uses
 * Sources
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26611547
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28375882
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31701313
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30613045
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27428352
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27428352

Option 5

 * Article title: Gigantism
 * Article Evaluation
 * The information appears relevant, but organized strangely
 * There are some slightly opinionated statements
 * Some claims do not have citations
 * The sources appear to be from official medical organizations and consist of official manuals and reviews, and are thus reliable
 * There is some discussion over whether Andre the Giant should really be listed as a person with gigantism, as well as what other examples could be given of people with the condition.
 * Sources
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30361628
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657986
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26585365
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28483363
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30855849
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30855849