User:Yrodriguez7/Asexuality/Dianabmorales Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Yrodriguez7


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yrodriguez7/Asexuality?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Asexuality

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The original article itself is rated as a good article, and indeed it looks like it covers a lot of ground, it is citing its sources, the sources are reliable, it is not plagiarized, has relevant pictures, and it is well written. I like your take on adding a new section clarifying the difference between "asexuality" and "celibacy" - it might be helpful for some people and it relevant to the topic. You might want to add a link to the wiki page about Celibacy there, as well as other wiki pages who's topics are mentioned in your sandbox - for example, Abstinence, Sex, Libido, and others. For the section "Intersections with race and disability", I noticed you aren't talking about race at all, rather only about disability - keep working on it and keep adding more information. I like that the content you are adding is not biased, rather you're sticking to facts. Your content is well written - it is concise and easy to read.

You did a great job at making sure all of your statements are backed up by references by citing your source - great job! However, you cited some sources twice as references under different numbers - try to cite your source only once and reuse the number it has assigned to it when you want to cite the same source again. Make sure your sources are reliable.