User:Yufei Z/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title :
 * Media bias
 * Article Evaluation
 * Article Evaluation

Although the title of the article is Media Bias, most of the content is related to politics, different languages, ethnicities, and religions, which deviates from the core topic. Although there is a discussion of the different categories of bias, most of them refer to political factors; there is no mention of how bias is manifested in different media categories, such as newspapers, internet, television, etc.

The article is not neutral in its stance and has a lot of references to the United States, China, and North Korea.

Citations are comprehensive, but the reliability of some of these sources needs to be investigated next.

The article suffers from underrepresentation and the factual examples of media bias are incomplete and potentially misleading.


 * Sources
 * Sources

Chiang, & Knight, B. (2011). Media Bias and Influence: Evidence from Newspaper Endorsements. The Review of Economic Studies, 78(3), 795–820. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdq037

Lee. (2012). That’s Not the Way It Is: How User-Generated Comments on the News Affect Perceived Media Bias. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01597.x

Gil de Zúñiga, Diehl, T., & Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2018). When Citizens and Journalists Interact on Twitter: Expectations of journalists’ performance on social media and perceptions of media bias. Journalism Studies (London, England), 19(2), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1178593 （important）

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Media psychology
 * Article Evaluation
 * Each section of the article is related to the topic. The article remains neutral, but certain statements need to be changed (history section). References are missing in the section on theoretical models, and more information needs to be added for all three theories. As a whole, there is much additional content that could be added, such as examples of the use of media psychology, is there evidence to support this? What are the implications of media psychology in different fields?
 * Each section of the article is related to the topic. The article remains neutral, but certain statements need to be changed (history section). References are missing in the section on theoretical models, and more information needs to be added for all three theories. As a whole, there is much additional content that could be added, such as examples of the use of media psychology, is there evidence to support this? What are the implications of media psychology in different fields?


 * Sources
 * Related research:   Reeves, Yeykelis, L., & Cummings, J. J. (2016). The Use of Media in Media Psychology. Media Psychology, 19(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1030083
 * Technology and audience:   Payne, & Dal Cin, S. (2015). Implicit Attitudes in Media Psychology. Media Psychology, 18(3), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1011341
 * Transdisciplinary research:   Weber. (2015). Brain, Mind, and Media: Neuroscience Meets Media Psychology. Journal of Media Psychology, 27(3), 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000162

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Popular culture
 * Article Evaluation
 * The content of the article is largely relevant to the topic. Some sub-sections (sources) of the article need to be further integrated and organized. The article is neutral and largely free from the personal thoughts of the editor. The first part that needs improvement is the lack of pop culture categories, such as mainstream media vs. non-mainstream media. Hot topics in pop culture, such as social conflicts, racial conflicts, feminism, etc. The article contains a criticism section, which seems to be abrupt. The content of this section revolves around some topics in pop culture, but the core elements of the article's theme are missing.
 * The content of the article is largely relevant to the topic. Some sub-sections (sources) of the article need to be further integrated and organized. The article is neutral and largely free from the personal thoughts of the editor. The first part that needs improvement is the lack of pop culture categories, such as mainstream media vs. non-mainstream media. Hot topics in pop culture, such as social conflicts, racial conflicts, feminism, etc. The article contains a criticism section, which seems to be abrupt. The content of this section revolves around some topics in pop culture, but the core elements of the article's theme are missing.


 * Sources
 * Tuzel, & Hobbs, R. (2017). The use of social media and popular culture to advance cross-cultural understanding. Comunicar (Huelva, Spain), 25(51), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.3916/C51-2017-06
 * Mavin, Elliott, C., Stead, V., & Williams, J. (2016). Women managers, leaders and the media gaze: Learning from popular culture, autobiographies, broadcast and media press. Gender in Management, 31(5-6), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-05-2016-0105

(need to find more research on different popular topics)

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources