User:YumoLu/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Mónica Aguilar Bonilla

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I came across this article under the Women in Archaeology category. The article is rated C-class with limited information about Mónica A. Bonilla. Since I would like to know more about Costa-Rican archaeologists, I chose this article to be evaluated.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

This Wikipedia article is informative and written with care (neutral tone, diverse sources, etc). However, some improvements can be made by fellow Wikipedians in terms of contents, article organization, and reference sources. Content-wise, everything presented is related to Mónica Aguilar Bonilla, but more information should be included, such as more personal information (eg. Birthplace, language spoken, etc), a more comprehensive lead section that illustrates Bonilla's contributions, and a list of her academic publications. The structure of the article also needs improvement. it is better to have Bonilla's education experiences appear earlier and not under the heading "Research." A better heading name should be given in replace of "sites" section because the application for World Heritage Status doesn't quite fall into this category. In terms of reference sources, all links work well but someone fluent with Spanish is needed to check the academic rigorousness of the sources. The talk page was empty and I put my evaluation there.