User:Yuusha9696/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Ye Haiyan

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
It was lacking information, so I wanted to see if I could improve it.

Evaluate the article
It does have a concise introductory sentence but it could be more informational about her actions in favor of her advocacies. The lead does introduce the article’s important section. The lead does not include unnecessary information and the lead is moderately informational.

The article’s content is relevant to the topic, and the content is not up-to-date because the last edit was in March 7, 2022. There is missing content about her possible awards and honors, works, and early life. It does address women and prostitutes which are underrepresented people.

The article is neutral and is not biased. There are no overrepresented or underrepresented viewpoints, and minority viewpoints are stated. The tone is neutral therefore no persuasion is used.

Not all facts are backed by a reliable secondary source but most of the sources are thorough. The sources are current to the timeline of the article, and the sources are written by organizations and individuals. The best source is from Guardian, but I am not aware if there are better sources available. Most of the links are accessible.

The article is clear of spelling and grammatical errors but is not broken up into sections.

There are no images.

No conversations are going on and the article is rated as stub-class. It is not part of any WikiProjects, and the article does not majorly differ from Wikipedia’s guidelines.

The article’s overall status is low, but its strengths are its strong sources. The article can be more informational, and it is underdeveloped.