User:Yuweij/Kunming Lake/BarrrrbY Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Yuweij


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Yuweij/Kunming Lake


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Kunming Lake

Lead

 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - The Lead stays original.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? - Yes, it introdueces the location, landscape near by, and the size, which gives readers a brief introduction of Kunming Lake.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? - The Lead covers most of the sections, except the tourist attraction section.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? - No, the Lead is just right for readers to get a brief information of Kunming Lake.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Yes, the added content of water source and tourist attractions are relevant to the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? - Yes, the content added are current information of Kunming Lake.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - All the content relates to the topic. But I think it would be better to add information about the number of tourists that travel to Kunming Lake each year in tourist attraction section.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? - The topic does not relate to underrepresented topics, so I think it should be fine.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? - Yes, most of the content is neutral. But it would be better to delete the word "obvious" in "However, the water source was obviously insufficient in 1949", because "obvious" sounds a little subjective.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? - No, the claims are fair.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? - No.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - The references about tourist attraction are from published book, which is reliable. However, the content in "water source" section have no reference yet, which should be added before publishing.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) - Yes, it is accurate.
 * Are the sources current? - Yes, the sources are published after 2000.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? - There are two authors so far that talks about tourist attraction of Kunming Lake. I think it would be better to add more reference that address to this topic.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? - Since the references are books, I did not find a way to check the ebook through the link.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - Yes, the language is fluent.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - The first sentences of Nanhu Island/Zhijing Pavilion Island/Zaojian Hall Island are not complete. It should be written as "XXX located on the east side of Kunming Lake".
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? - Yes, the content is organized logically.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? - Yes, by introducing water source and tourist attraction, readers would have a better understanding about Kunming Lake.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? - It introduces the value of Kunming Lake as a tourist landscape.
 * How can the content added be improved? - If there are any shows or literature ever mentioned Kunming Lake, it would be great to add those information. Also, there should be reference for water source section.