User:Yuxiang4/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Lao She
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. It's a collections of Lao She's life and distrubution

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? yes

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Very relevant
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes, it's used 2015 references and data
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Missing something.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? In Works part, he used his words to summary the contents of Laoshe's books.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
 * Are the sources current? Some of them was from 20th Century
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Written by diverse authors
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, they work.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, easy to understand for the structure and words
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? Seems good
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, audiences could clearly know the different parts and easy to follow the article

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes
 * Are images well-captioned? No
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes, the image open to the public
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? At the top of article

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Add some new external links and relevant references
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Rated Start-class. It's part of Wikiprojects
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? In Wiki, people need use many links to improve their opinions. Also the question and edited contents were divided into several sections which easily to know the edited dates.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? It's very detailed which concluded plenty of aspects and completed references
 * What are the article's strengths? Clearly article structure, completed references
 * How can the article be improved? Need more images or video to attach audiences
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Well-developed

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback:User talk:Yuxiang4/Evaluate an Article