User:Yuzhan Yuzhan/Bizui888/New sandbox/Yuzhan Yuzhan Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Bizui888/New sandbox
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Bizui888/New sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, he wrote few days ago before class.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, there is a brief summary of major section.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, the lead is brief and clear
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Yes, it’s very concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, it’s relavant
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, it’s updated.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, this content is well connected.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, it’s all descriptive content.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, it’s objective
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, there are no viewpoints that are over represented or under represented.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, these is no position yet.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No, some article in source don’t have author name
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, the content is related with the topic.
 * Are the sources current? It’s long time ago. There is one source in 2002.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, they all work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, it’s very concise, clear and easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I don’t find any grammatical errors.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? This content is no completed, but well-organized.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, i have clear understanding of China Internet cafe.
 * Are images well-captioned? There is no image yet.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? There is no image yet.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? There is no image yet.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes, there are several reliable sources.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Yes, the sources are connected with the topic
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes, the structure is similar with other articles.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? No, it doesn’t link with other ariticles.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, it’s a small part. It can be improved by completion
 * What are the strengths of the content added? It’s very powerful based on my experience in mainland.
 * How can the content added be improved? There is lots of contents that can be added.

Overall evaluation
i think you do a very good job of first draft of your wiki project. I am interested in your topic. The Internet cafe is serious problem for China.