User:Yvette 282/Murder of Gabriel Fernandez/Derek Hales 241 Peer Review

Neutral Content

 * Do you think you could guess the perspective of the author by reading the article? The author holds a neutral perspective.
 * Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y." For the most part, every word seems neutral but there are a few words such as, "records have a big ordeal on why this young child passed"
 * Does the article make claims on behalf of unnamed groups or people? For example, "some people say..." The article does not make claims on behalf of unnamed groups or people, it does although feel as it could be taking the side of the victim. The use of words such as, "Neglecting" found in paragraph 2 may give a sense of bias. Although the word neglect is found in laws such as child neglect laws, it does sound as if the author is taking the side of the victim in the case.
 * Does the article focus too much on negative or positive information? Remember, neutral doesn't mean "the best positive light" or "the worst, most critical light." It means a clear reflection of various aspects of a topic. The article remains neutral on the information presented. Information such as, names and charges pressed which is good because it ensures your article remains free from bias.

Reliable Sources

 * Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? All sources come from a reliable source
 * Are there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources? If so, it may lead to an unbalanced article, or one that leans too heavily into a single point of view. The article uses each source equally and fairly
 * Are there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you can't find stated in the references? Just because there is a source listed, doesn't mean it's presented accurately! Every statement is supported with a source.

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)