User:Yxg3899/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
History of art

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

This is a very comprehensive article, which covers many aspects,but there are still flaws.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead SectionIn my opinion, the intrductry sentence dose not clearly describe the topic. The history of art does not focus on objects made by humans in visual form for aesthetic purposes. It does not focus on object. History of are is about telling the stories behind art. In face, what this article introduses later is also the story beind the art.

Content

It is a comprehensive introduction to art history with a timeline and geographical location.

Tone and Balance

There are some words like "I think" in this article. Author use peronal opinion to evluate the art work, not neutral enough.

Source and Reference

Sources and References are comprehensive and reliable. Sources are current. The links work.

Oraganization and Writing quality

Oraganization and writing quality is good. The article is clear and easy to read. Except for some spoken words like "I think" which cannot appear in the academic paper.

Image and Media

Images are very abundant in this article and enhence understanding of the topic. However, it is a little messy. Some images appear in other seactions.

Talk Page Disscussion

History of art has been listed as a level-2 vital article in History. This article has been rated as C-Class.