User:Yyba12/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Cabbage (Cabbage)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate: Firstly, I chose the WikiProject as the "database". And after clicking it, I tried to find the category that attracted me the most. Then i chose "Food and Drink". Because I'm on a diet now then I chose the article "Cabbage".

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation

 * Firstly, the Lead does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. And there is a brief description of the article's major sectons. And this Lead does not include information that is not present in the article. However, in my opinion, this Lead is a little bit overly detailed just because it is too long as a Lead with too much information such as related plants.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Content evaluation

 * The article's content is all relevant to the topic and it is really up-to-date. Because the one of the latest refrences included was updated in 2020 and the information is also up-to-date. Also, there isn't missing and unbelonged content. And it does not related to historically underrepresented populations and topics.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone of the article is neutral and there isn't any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. The balance is also good.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
All 8 citations are backing up the facts and they are all reliable. And those sources are mostly current. Howeverm, some data mentioned in the article is out-of-date. And I tried over 15 links. All of them worked.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The article is quite long instead of being concise. In my opinion, because of good breakdowns it isn't too easy to read. And there isn't any grammatical and spelling errors.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
Yes the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic and there are at least 1 pic in each section. These images are well-captioned and adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Talk page evaluation
The conversations are mainly several questions raised by the readers. Also, one of them could not distinguish the two kinds of cabbage. It is rated FA-Class and it is a part of WikiProject: Food and Drinks.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Overall evaluation
The overall status of this article is featured because it is concise also detailed. There isn't too much useless information. And this article could be improved by switching some latest data. In my opinion, this article is well-developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: