User:ZBlalock/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Reality–virtuality continuum


 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is still in its extreme infancy, and expanding it may prove too difficult to tackle for this class. The article is so underdeveloped that it has not received any rating, so it is safe to assume this article would be grouped with "start" class articles. Additionally, a lot of claims are missing citations. The lead, one of the most critical aspects of the article, is missing citations. The talk page is also barren.


 * Sources
 * https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/2351/0000/Augmented-reality--a-class-of-displays-on-the-reality/10.1117/12.197321.short?SSO=1
 * https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/920621

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Mixed reality


 * Article Evaluation
 * Like the Reality–virtuality continuum article, this article does not have a class. However, it is much more comprehensive than the former and I would not rate this as a "start" article. Further, this article is part of a WikiProject which gives an incentive to choose this article. The talk page has more discussion than the first article, but nothing has been edited since March and no new discussions have began since 2019. The structure of the article is cohesive, with a strong lead that introduces the main topics discussed in the article, but each section could easily be expanded and there are certainly credible papers released since the last article edit that should be added. This article is a strong candidate for editing.


 * Sources
 * https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-00437-7_3
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296318305319

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Projection augmented model


 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is rated start class, which provides good incentive to pursue editing, but it is rated low importance which makes this article less desirable. The lead is extremely short, and only consists of a short summary of the main concept in the article. The lead fails to introduce the main points of the article, which is a necessity that would be addressed if chosen to edit. Additionally, the talk page is empty. I find this topic and its applications very interesting, but this article seems to be best approached with a complete rewrite which may be outside the scope of the Wikipedia assignment.


 * Sources
 * https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/105474602317343677
 * https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1509163

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources