User:ZDANIELR/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title Queer ecology
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes. The article seems like it is very relevant to the topic at hand. Due to the open nature of the topic, it would be a bit hard to not be relevant.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Due to the warnings at the top of the article, Wikipedians have decided that the article may give undue weight to a certain idea. Therefore, we can confirm that it is not written neutrally.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * It looks like most if not all claims have a citation.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Due to the warnings at the top of the article, Wikipedians have decided that the citations may not be reliable. Therefore, we can assume that some of the citations may not be the best option.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * I think that the article is trying to do that by representing the queer community in the field of ecology.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 2

 * Article title Filter bubble
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * This articles content is very relevant to the topic. It is very well written and has a lot of context.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * It looks like the Countermeasures section has a warning label that says that it isn't truly written neutrally.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * It looks like there are a large number of citations that seem to cover most of the article.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Looking at the references section, it seems that they are all reliable.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No, I don't believe that it does. However, it covers a topic that does affect underrepresented communities.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title Algorithmic radicalization
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * This article is a stub, but what is written is relevant.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes, the stub is written neutrally.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes, each claim has a citation
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes, the citations are reliable it seems.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No, this article does not address underrepresented communities or topics.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources