User:ZS010270/Undecaprenyl Phosphate/Pacman118 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

ZS010270


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ZS010270/Undecaprenyl_Phosphate?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * C55-isoprenyl pyrophosphate

Evaluate the drafted changes
I feel like the lead section of the article was pretty good and explanatory, although it may have been a little on the long end. The lead also didn’t have a brief description of the article’s main descriptions but other than that, the lead was very helpful and clear.

From reading the article, I feel like the content was very relevant and helpful. It allowed me to understand some of the most important information about UP. I also feel that you included many of the important topics, although I bet with current research being done there will be more topics to add in the future. You also did a great job showing the different viewpoints of research and the article was relatively free from bias. I feel like you had a lot of good resources in the reference section and I was happy to see that they were all mainly current resources for the most part.

I feel like your content was neutral in tone and balanced in the claims presented. I also am not a pro in microbiology so I’m not quite sure what other opinions are out there, but you didn’t seem biased in your writing about any viewpoints. I did not feel persuaded one way or another so that was good.

I was very impressed with how many resources you used as a group! You added a lot of resources to the original article and you added so much pertinent and important information as well! Your links worked great if you were wondering!

The writing was well written although there were a few grammatical errors (I counted three but there may have been more so look for those!). One thing that I would recommend overall is to add an image with a good caption. Those go a long way! I think you for sure followed wikipedia’s guidelines in as many aspects as you possibly could! One final improvement that I would make is linking a few of the vocab words from your article to those articles in wikipedia. This might make your article a bit more accessible.

Overall, great job! You can tell that you worked hard and spent a lot of time writing this article and I am very impressed.