User:ZZZXS/Chemical safety/XXryoul Peer Review

General info
ZZZXS
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:ZZZXS/Chemical safety:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Chemical safety

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Hi Jack! Here's my peer review for you.

Lead
Yes, the lead has been updated. The lead concisely have an introductory sentence followed by the definition of chemical safety. It clearly describes the article's topic. The lead is missing a brief description of the major section: risks and hazards, and management and control. It should improved by adding a brief description of what the article is covering. Overall, the lead is well-detailed.

Content
The content added provides relevant and up-to-date information on chemical safety, covering various aspects such as risks, hazards, management, and control measures. It appropriately discusses the global impact of hazardous chemicals on human health and the environment, including statistics on deaths and disability-adjusted life-years lost. Additionally, it addresses the disparities in chemical safety between richer and poorer countries, highlighting factors such as regulatory frameworks, resource availability, and education on safety. For the most part, there are no missing content or content that does not belong to the section.

Tone and Balance

 * Is the content added neutral? -The tone of the content is neutral, presenting information objectively without bias. It offers a balanced perspective on chemical safety, acknowledging both the challenges and progress made in different regions and socioeconomic contexts. There are no claims that appear heavily biased toward any particular position, and viewpoints are presented fairly.

Sources and References
The content is supported by reliable secondary sources, including reputable journals, government publications, and international organizations. The sources accurately reflect the information presented in the article and cover a wide range of topics related to chemical safety. While the majority of sources are current, some older citations could be updated to ensure the inclusion of the latest research and developments in the field. For finding better resources, the references provided are apparent and clear enough to support the article. All references added worked smoothly.

Organization
The content is well-written, concise, and easy to read, with clear section headings that reflect the major points of the topic. There are no apparent grammatical or spelling errors, enhancing the overall readability of the article. The information is logically organized, guiding the reader through different aspects of chemical safety in a systematic manner.

Images and Media
Yes, there are pictures added to enhance understanding. The captions could be improved by adding more informations and the consistencies of upper case at the start of the sentence should be improved. Overall, the images are well-organized.

Overall impressions
The content added has significantly improved the quality and completeness of the article on chemical safety. Its strengths lie in its comprehensive coverage of various aspects of chemical safety, including risks, management strategies, and global perspectives. To further enhance the article, additional updates could be made to include more recent research findings and to ensure the inclusion of diverse perspectives on the topic. Overall, the article provides valuable insights into the importance of chemical safety in protecting human health and the environment.