User:Za'NettaS/Pearl Cleage/NoahMullens Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Za'NettaS
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:Za'NettaS/Pearl Cleage

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * On the original article, it needs to mention what you are adding. So, mention briefly her inspirations.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes (og article)
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes (og article)
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No (og article)
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It seems a little too short in the og article, but the article itself is pretty short.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yesd
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * "she must write about the struggle for black people to be free and how she not feel oppressed by this idea"
 * I would break this sentence up, and explain what she means when she says she does not feel oppressed by the idea
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Maybe flesh out more what you mean about her inspirations, citing specific books that inspired her. Be a little more specific to add content. And, also, in the og article you might be able to add more information to existing sections.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes. However, you need to cite it not in the text, but through the citation tool.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes, they seem to.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * There are no links

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Ye, but some of the sentences could be fleshed out or reorganized to be a little more clear.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * You are adding an influences section, but I do not know where in the article, so I cannot really answer this question

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * N/A
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * N/A

note: you could add a picture of her to the article

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * N/A
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * N/A
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * N/A
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
 * N/A

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes, it would strengthen the article by citing influences and adding more about her life.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * It fleshes out her involvement in Black Arts and her literary influences
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * You could add more to the article in general, since there is not much in the og article