User:ZachRumley/Stomiidae/Cp31201 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Team Argus, specifically Amacdo and Kcilley


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ZachRumley/Stomiidae?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template (just reviewing the lure bioluminescence section at the bottom)


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Stomiidae (just reviewing the lure bioluminescence section at the bottom)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Added a whole new section that wasn't there before so thats already good progress for the Stomiidae page. Everything in the paragraph was relevant to the topic of the added section was called "lure bioluminescence" and while it was good information that they added, it doesn't seem like too much, as it is only 3 sentences. The added sentences were neutral and the links worked, as well as support the claims in the article. Each fact is supported by a reliable source, as both links led to scientific journals with no biases noticed as of now. I'm not sure what the standard is for what is considered recent or not but one article is from 2014 which isn't too bad but the other article is from 2007 so I guess that one could be seen as outdated. However, if no new information in regards to lure bioluminescence then the 2007 source can still be deemed valid.

Reply
Thanks for the helpful feedback! -Amacdo