User:Zacharystark02/2012 Colorado wildfires/Alyssanapoli Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Zacharystark02
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Zacharystark02/2012 Colorado wildfires

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? not really. there were links but nothing written about what info is being drawn from the links
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? no
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? no
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? too vague

Lead evaluation
needs more work and info

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? n/a
 * Is the content added up-to-date? n/a
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? n/a
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
 * Are the sources current? yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? no
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? no
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? not really. pretty vague

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? the sources were strong and reliable with plenty of information that can be added
 * How can the content added be improved? just add more info and organize it