User:Zbernstein21/sandbox

Evaluating content

 * Everything seems relevant to the topic, but the issue is more that there isn't a whole lot of information.
 * Everything seems very factual, and there is nothing that could have changed to make it out of date. There is a lot missing that could be added, such as more history, more information on the analysis of the piece, and information about the reception of the piece and its place among the history of music and Dvorak's other symphonies.

Evaluating tone

 * The article's tone seems neutral, but there isn't a lot of article to actually evaluate. Examining what is there, I cannot find any information that seems biased toward any particular position.

Evaluating sources

 * This is the big issue with this article. There is only one source cited, and only the first sentence has a citation attached to it. The remaining information has no sources, which is definitely something that needs to be fixed. What's worse is that there are no actual reference sources consulted because the only source cites is the score itself. There is probably plenty of information out there about this piece that is not being utilized.

Checking the talk page

 * The article is part of WikiProject Classical Music but the project does not use a rating system. Otherwise, there is nothing on the talk page other than a comment from 2007 saying "needs expansion," which is obvious.

Article Selection

 * Symphony No. 1 (Bernstein): Very little information about the history or musical analysis of the composition. It is not the most famous of symphonies but the entry should probably have much more than what is there now.
 * Symphony No. 3 (Dvorak): Like the above, there is very little on the history and analysis of the piece. This is a more famous symphony and therefore should certainly contain more information.
 * War Doctor: Seems fairly complete, but it is rated start-class, so I'm sure there is much more information out there that I could find and add to it.
 * Season of Anomy: The plot section of this article is entirely empty, and though I have not read the novel I probably could in order to write a plot summary. There is likely more information out there about its history and reception, especially in terms of why it was deemed a "failure," as the article currently states.