User:Zbrooks142/Toledan/Zbrooks142 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ftwz9p


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ftwz9p/Toledan_Tables?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Toledan Tables

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The reorganization of the information adds a better chronological order to the information in the article. The addition of the information on ephemerides is useful but could maybe use a better placement, it feels misplaced between the paragraphs before and after.

Overall, the changes improve the article, some more work can be done on finding a proper home for the section on ephemerides. More expansion of information as well as sources used will be needed to fully flesh out the article.

Peer Review Response
Thanks for the review, but going forward the ephemerides section was put there temporally put there while the draft was still in the process of being written. Once the section gets filled out it will find a better spot within the article. I am now in the process of fleshing out the information with a proper background and referecing good sources.