User:Zeb23/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Lesbian Art Project
 * I thought that it would be interesting to learn about the artwork done by lesbians and explore how their works have impacted art and history.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * The Lead includes an introduction to the subject and talks about the women who made this event happen.
 * The Lead doesn't talk about the article's main sections, which are missing from the article
 * The Lead doesn't include information not present in the article.
 * The Lead is overly detailed in for some subjects while it is lacking detail on other subjects

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * The article's content is relevant to the topic
 * The last update to this article was in November of 2018
 * There is content missing but the authors discussed how a lot of the information about the event was dismissed by the media and critics

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * The article is neutral.
 * One claim that sounds heavily biased is when the authors are talking about how there isn't a lot of information about the Lesbian Art Project
 * The authors don't talk about Arlene Raven nearly as much as they talk about Terry Wolverton.
 * The article doesn't seem to try to persuade the readers toward one side or the other.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Not all of the facts are backed up with reliable sources.
 * The sources are thorough and relate to the subject
 * Not all of the sources are current but there are a good handful that are from this decade
 * All of the links work.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * The article doesn't have any images included in the article.
 * There are no captions for the images due to the lack of them.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * The conversations going on behind the scenes is just general information about the changes in the article.
 * The article doesn't seem to have a rating and the article is part of the Wikiprojects.
 * The Wikipedia article discusses the topic in a relaxed and carefree

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * The article's status is still under editing and discussion about the topic.
 * The article goes in depth about the people involved in the Lesbian Art Project and it talks about the critics and artists that dismissed the Lesbian Art Project
 * The article can provide more information about the Lesbian Art Project itself and the women who made this project happen.
 * The article is underdeveloped and needs more work done on it.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: