User:ZedZeppelin/sandbox

B O L D

Article Evaluation: Information Privacy

 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
 * Each fact does not contain an appropriate reference
 * For example: the first sentence/description should have a reference
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * The writing style is a bit distracting and opinionated
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is not neutral. There are a few personal suggestions and should be reviewed
 * Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * The information comes from journals, articles, government websites, and magazines.
 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented?
 * Western viewpoints are heavily present with no reference to privacy in other regions of the world
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
 * The citation links work and there is no apparent plagiarism that I could find
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Some information is out of date (2007/2008)

Article Evaluation: Microchip Implant (Human)

 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
 * Each fact seems to have a reference but they are not from the most reliable sources
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything is relevant but does not expand on the topic enough
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is as neutral as possible given their sources
 * Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * The information mainly comes from news articles and a few journals
 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented?
 * The information tends to focus on the people who have implanted themselves with microchips. It could benefit from more information about microchips themselves.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
 * The citation links work and there does not appear to be an plagiarism
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * There is a lot of out-of-date and unreliable information