User:ZekkenX/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have chosen this article as that is what CCAS 175 is about, Chicana artists. My impressions regarding this article is how little Chicana is shown throughout many articles that involve Chicana’s as well as how when looking up Chicana, Chicana art does not show up right away. There is not as much information that I would have imagined besides a little bit of background information of Chicana art and little to no up to date material.

Evaluate the article
To begin, the lead section of the article is nice and simple with providing a concise amount of information that would not immediately overload the read but my impression from here on out goes downhill on such an important subject. The article does provide the important, standout information but is very barebones. The information is fairly neutral but in some parts there is no citation such as “ was not as popularly utilized among Chicana” seeming more of an opinion and no hard source to back it up. Images of the topic of Chicana art is few to none which should have more as that is the talk of the article. There is no conversations revolving the article besides article link and that provides a summary of my impression, there isn’t much support and evidence of the subject and is very lacking in information on such a major topic especially today.